image

Warm Global Customers

With China Plastic Machinery

Want to visit our factory?

Hunan sentenced the defendant in a bus arson case to 4 years in prison

Xinhua Changsha October 24 (reporter Chen Wenguang) 24, Yuhua District Court in Changsha, Hunan Province first instance trial defendant Chen Yongsen set fire to the case. The defendant, Chen Yongsen, was sentenced to four years in prison for arson.

After trial, it was found that on July 6, 2014, defendant Chen Yongsen was unhappy with life, love and other things, frustrated in finding a job, and affected by the arson of a bus in Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, on July 5, 2014, he had the intention of setting fire to Changsha City, Hunan Province to retaliate against society.

On July 9, 2014, Defendant Chen Yongsen took train K1373 from Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province to Changsha at 8:26 on July 10, 2014. At 16:00 on the same day, Chen bought "Liushen" toilet water, green tea and other articles in a supermarket, and filled three bottles of toilet water in empty plastic bottles of green tea. At about 5:15 on July 11, 2014, Defendant Chen Yongsen took the backpack containing the above articles to Changsha Railway Station, boarded a No. 7 bus bound for Changsha South Railway Station. When the bus reached Caojia Po section of Shaoshan Road, Yuhua District, Changsha City, Defendant Chen Yongsen took out the above articles, poured the toilet water inside the plastic bottle into the carriage and lit it on fire. Then the bottle of toilet water lit and sprayed everywhere, more than 30 passengers aboard the car then panic off, resulting in Huang Chanyu, Zhou Yonghua in the crowded off the fall, bruises (are minor injuries), the car driver Chang Jianwei immediately with a fire extinguisher extinguish the fire.

After the incident, the defendant Chen Yongsen remained at the scene knowing that other passengers had alerted the police, and the public security police rushed to the scene of the incident to take it to the public security organs after truthfully confessed the above facts.

The court held that the defendant Chen Yongsen, in order to vent his private anger, carried out the act of arson on the public transport, endangering public security, but did not cause serious consequences, and his behavior constituted the crime of arson and should be punished. The defendant Chen Yongsen, knowing that other passengers had called the police after the case, remained at the scene and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime, which is regarded as automatic surrender, can be identified as surrender, and can be given a lighter punishment according to law. Therefore, the aforesaid judgment was made in accordance with law.

Plastic Industry Video